<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>openSUSE Spotlight &#187; reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zonker.opensuse.org/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zonker.opensuse.org</link>
	<description>Shining a spotlight on the openSUSE Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Early review of openSUSE 11.2</title>
		<link>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2009/10/05/early-review-of-opensuse-11-2/</link>
		<comments>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2009/10/05/early-review-of-opensuse-11-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zonker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zonker.opensuse.org/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZDNet&#8217;s Jason Perlow takes an early look at openSUSE 11.2, and finds it quite good:
openSUSE’s implementation of KDE 4.3 finally gives the Open Source and Linux community something to brag about from a UI technology perspective, and in many ways I feel it is superior to both Windows 7, in both the underpinning technology and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZDNet&#8217;s Jason Perlow takes an <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/perlow/?p=11243">early look at openSUSE 11.2</a>, and finds it quite good:</p>
<blockquote><p>openSUSE’s implementation of KDE 4.3 finally gives the Open Source and Linux community something to brag about from a UI technology perspective, and in many ways I feel it is superior to both Windows 7, in both the underpinning technology and from a usability standpoint. It is also at least at parity in terms of object oriented technology with Mac OS X, and Qt 4’s cross-platform nature may actually give KDE an edge over Mac’s Cocoa. KDE 4.3 is pretty and functional, proving that Open Source advocates that choose a Linux OS for their desktop can have their cake, eat it as well as flaunt it.</p></blockquote>
<p>He also has a few comments about the security settings affecting use of Samba on first install, but overall &#8212; looks good.</p>
<p>He also has a screencast of openSUSE 11.2 with KDE 4.3, which is well worth a look if you haven&#8217;t already installed M8. (But of course <a href="http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/01/opensuse-11-2-milestone-8-released/">you have</a>, right?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2009/10/05/early-review-of-opensuse-11-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>openSUSE 11.0RC1 gets high marks on ZDNet</title>
		<link>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2008/06/03/opensuse-110rc1-gets-high-marks-on-zdnet/</link>
		<comments>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2008/06/03/opensuse-110rc1-gets-high-marks-on-zdnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zonker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zdnet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zonker.opensuse.org/2008/06/03/opensuse-110rc1-gets-high-marks-on-zdnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over on ZDNet, Jason Perlow says that openSUSE 11.0 is the &#8220;Mercedes-Benz to Ubuntu’s Volkswagen.&#8221;
The first thing you’ll notice about OpenSUSE 11 is the completely renovated installer program. In fact, I’d have to say that next to Mac, this is probably the most beautiful installer program I have ever seen. Beauty isn’t just skin deep, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on ZDNet, Jason Perlow says that openSUSE 11.0 is the &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8988" title="OpenSUSE 11 RC1: The Mercedes-Benz to Ubuntu’s Volkswagen">Mercedes-Benz to Ubuntu’s Volkswagen</a>.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>The first thing you’ll notice about OpenSUSE 11 is the completely renovated installer program. In fact, I’d have to say that next to Mac, this is probably the most beautiful installer program I have ever seen. Beauty isn’t just skin deep, however — a lot of time and work has been invested to make the SUSE installer faster and easier to use. A complete install, with everything, including GNOME, KDE, XFCE and the development and server packages — sans the multilingual documentation selected on my ThinkPad T60, with a 32-bit 1.8Ghz Core Duo and 2GB of RAM took approximately 40 minutes. That ain’t too shabby for a full DVD worth of stuff.</p>
<p>I am also quite impressed with how fast the package repository management works in the RC1 release. In 10.3, the initial repository setup could take up to a half an hour, and would frequently bomb out.  Not with 11.0 — a dozen repos, which include the vast user-contributed <a href="http://packman.links2linux.org/"><strong>PACKMAN</strong></a> in Germany as well as the newly launched OpenSUSE build service, only took a few minutes to set up. The new software update utility is also significantly faster and much more stable. For those of you who prefer a command line, the “<a href="http://en.opensuse.org/Zypper/Usage"><strong>zypper</strong></a>” utility will provide a similar experience to “yum” or “apt-get” on Fedora/Red Hat and Ubuntu/Debian, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p>The review is very positive, but I do disagree with Perlow&#8217;s assessment that  &#8220;at this point in the distro’s evolution, it is not the Linux for the masses or even for the people. It remains true to its roots, which was and still is for power users with systems that can fully take advantage of everything it has to offer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, openSUSE 11.0 will still be good for power users and that openSUSE 11.0 is true to its roots &#8212; but I think 11.0 will be one of the very best distros for those new to Linux as well. Not necessarily those new to <em>computers</em> but I think Windows defectors will have a relatively easy time of it using openSUSE 11.0.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be <strike>inflicting 11.0 rc 1</strike> proving that theory over the next few days with my friends and family. What better test subjects than the ones you love? <img src='http://zonker.opensuse.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zonker.opensuse.org/2008/06/03/opensuse-110rc1-gets-high-marks-on-zdnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
