The FOSSCamp idea is, from one angle, fairly dicey — you take a bunch of people interested in topics that are generally similar (in this case, free and open source software), mix well, and allow them to come up with an agenda that’s their own and which will (one hopes) be productive.

I’ve always been an advocate of a strong “hallway track” for shows — i.e., ample opportunity for attendees to mix it up outside of a structured set of sessions. I’ve been to too many shows where you start to feel like a hamster on a wheel — too busy running from one session to the next to actually stop, breathe, and chat with the other attendees and presenters.

Yes, it’s wonderful to listen to experts talk about the topics they are expert in, but one can only stand so much being talked at without any time to talk with people. At least that’s true for me — maybe I’m just scarred from too many years in college.

But FOSSCamp is essentially all hallway track, right? Maybe that is pushing it a bit too far in the other direction.

In some cases, that might be true. However, it seems that this FOSSCamp managed to get the balance right. I attended several sessions that seemed very useful — including one where the original session didn’t happen due to the session leader not showing up, so we eventually just wound up having a discussion (mostly) about communication between projects, how best to provide software to a community for testing (I admit it, I couldn’t help slipping in several plugs for the openSUSE Build Service here…), and the best ways to credit other projects for work included in a distro (for example, the need for acknowledging where features come from, and how best to give credit).

So, big bonus for the FOSSCamp model of allowing attendees to build their own conference — this works when the attendees are motivated to be involved and share knowledge.

(In the interest of giving credit, I should mention that FOSSCamp was sponsored by Canonical/Ubuntu, prior to their developer summit this week.)

We also had good planned sessions Saturday morning around Packagekit and Saturday afternoon around distro collaboration. There were also good sessions on Friday, but I think Saturday was the better day — after all involved had one day to get acquainted and (for me) a day to overcome jet lag a bit.

In general, I think the FOSSCamp model is a really good one. I’d like to see more conferences have at least one FOSSCamp style day — probably best if served up in the middle of the conference so that attendees have an opportunity to get settled, get acquainted a bit, and confer a bit on what sessions most people might benefit from/like to attend.

This entry is filed under Commentary, Events, Marketing open source. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.